If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As https://combounce4.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/07/how-long-away-from-a-new-5g-mobile-tower-system-for-anyone-who-is/ , they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In https://canvas.instructure.com/eportfolios/2008586/Home/Are_usually_safest_distance_from_the_5G_cell_Structure to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.